Here’s a classic song with a video that proves singers should sing, and actors should act.
What’s not to love here?
John Waite‘s hair is pure ’80s gold, with feathery blow-dry action in the front and a sneaky pseudo-mullet in the back. It’s a Don Johnson-punk mullet. Plus he rocks the standard One Dangly Earring look that every lead singer was required to have for about two years.
HOWEVER: What’s most interesting to me is how the lyrics clash with the video.
The lyrics avoid being “on the nose,” which is Hollywood screenwriter slang for people saying, or singing, exactly what they mean. Nobody in real life does that. It’s not realistic, not good for a story and not fun for the audience.
People avoid coming out and saying directly what they truly feel.
A hero doesn’t say, “Hey, I’m really scared, and I don’t want to die, so maybe you could drop that gun and let me handcuff you, seeing how I don’t want to get shot or get stuck with piles of paperwork if I shoot you first.” He says, “Do you feel lucky, punk? Well, do ya?”
A villain doesn’t say, “Being locked up in this dark basement next to low-level lunatics is beyond boring, and I would rather stick needles in my eye than communicate with these beasts, but pretty young FBI agents are something I never get to see, so I hope you stick around and talk to me for hours, Special Agent.” He says, “A census taker once tried to test me. I ate his liver with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.”
So while the acting and the visuals in the video are completely on the nose, with zero ambiguity or subtlety, the lyrics are great and full of subtext.
John Waite misses his girlfriend / lover / wife, but he doesn’t say, “Hey baby, I miss you a lot, and I’m a wreck, and I wish you’d come back.”
He sings, “I ain’t missing you” and follows that up with “I ain’t missing you at all” and seven other variations of the same thing.
But we know he’s lying.
And that’s what makes this song a classic.
5 thoughts on “MISSING YOU by John Waite teaches us all about subtext”
Great song, and while I agree there’s subtext, I always thought of this as the great modern example of “the lady doth protest too much, methinks.”
Also, major points for inclusion of Adam Ant, for whom I harbor a deep and abiding love. So much awesome. Plus, no man has ever worn the billowing pirate shirt with more panache – not even Fabio.
Love this song, but preferred Tears…a little more guitar in it
Ah. Subtext? Subtlety? Is there anything better?
Are you sure he’s fibbing? He almost had me convinced.